Online Practice Manuals

REC Holdings Co. v. Peat Marwick Thorne

• 1995 CanLII 811 (BC SC)
  • Go to CanLII for full text

The above case is referenced within:

1. Discovery Practice in British Columbia (Current to: January 15 2026)
   • Chapter 3. Examination for Discovery
     • XII. What Matters May Be Examined in a Discovery [§3.65]
       • A. General Principles Guiding the Scope of Examinations for Discovery [§3.66]
         • 1. “Relating to a Matter in Question in the Action”: The Question of Relevance [§3.67]
       • B. Questions That May and May Not Be Asked on an Examination for Discovery [§3.70]
         • 3. Questions Relating to Similar Facts and Similar Acts [§3.73]
     • XIII. Conducting the Examination for Discovery [§3.93]
       • B. Examination Style and Questioning Techniques [§3.101]
         • 4. Types of Questions to Avoid: Impropriety and Ambiguity [§3.110]
           • f. Questions That Have Been “Asked and Answered” [§3.116]
     • XVI. After the Examination for Discovery [§3.176]
       • D. Error in Witness’s Testimony—Examining Counsel’s Perspective [§3.180]